SAGA logo

A project of Cornell and Clark-Atlanta Universities for research and technical assistance
USAID logo Cornell logoCAU logo
SAGA Home
Link to Research
Link to Publications
Link to Technical Assistance
Link to Conferences
Link to Grants
Link to Partners
Link to Project Personnel
Link to Progress Reports
Link to Links Page
Link to Contacts
Link to Search Engine











SAGA
B16 MVR Hall
Ithaca, NY 14853
(607) 255-8931
Fax (607) 255-0178
saga@cornell.edu

SAGA Progress Report
October, 2003

II. RESEARCH
   B. Kenya


By African standards, Kenya enjoys relative abundance of good quality primary data for economic analysis and of skilled researchers doing rigorous, policy-relevant research. SAGA seeks to exploit this comparative advantage through a decentralized design that elicits work from several able economic research institutions in Kenya. The program is also targeted toward informing debate on high profile policy questions highlighted in the new Kenya Rural Development Strategy (KRDS) and Poverty Reduction Strategy Paper (PRSP) processes in the aftermath of national elections that resulted in the country’s first change in the party in power since independence. The PRSP has identified agricultural and rural development as Kenya’s number one priority for poverty alleviation and economic growth. The KRDS has emphasized problems of risk and vulnerability, market access, and smallholder empowerment as central to agricultural and rural development. USAID-Kenya is actively addressing these issues through its own program of work (under mission SOs 6 and 7). Toward those ends, the SAGA-Kenya research program is organized as a set of subsidiary research projects conducted by a consortium of research institutions, as discussed further below.

1. Specific themes and activities:

The SAGA-Kenya program has two key themes — "Reducing risk and vulnerability in rural Kenya" and "Empowering the rural poor" — with interrelated sub-projects by affiliated institutions and individual researchers. Each of the two key themes will lead to a policy workshop to present key research findings to Kenyan research, policymaker and donor communities. Each sub-project within each theme will deliver at least one policy brief and at least one publishable conference paper. Tentatively, we plan to publish a revised, edited proceedings volume from each of the two policy workshops. In addition, the Institute of Policy Analysis and Research (IPAR) and Cornell plan to co-organize a workshop on "Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Method of Poverty Analysis in Kenya," tentatively scheduled for March 2004, with significant support from the World Bank Country Office.

Under the theme "Reducing risk and vulnerability in rural Kenya," the team is pursuing interrelated sub-projects on the following sub-themes, and expects to hold a policy workshop in the first half of 2005:
  • The role of producer organizations in reducing smallholder vulnerability: Led by Tegemeo, this sub-project analyzes the impact of producer organizations on smallholder market access and vulnerability to income shocks, price, and yield volatility, identifying what organizational functions prove most effective and how these are most efficiently and reliably provided, especially to poorer smallholders. The Tegemeo project is augmented by dissertation research by a Kenyan economics Ph.D. candidate at Cornell, Andrew Mude, doing closely related research with partial funding from a SAGA competitive small grant and from the Rockefeller Foundation. Mr. Mude began field data collection in September 2003 and will complete his field work early in 2004.

  • Agricultural marketing systems, price volatility and vulnerability of smallholder producers and poor consumers: Led by the Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis (KIPPRA), this sub-project studies changing marketing systems and household strategies for coping with market risk, seeking in particular to explain and identify effective strategies to reverse the apparent widespread retreat toward subsistence production by many smallholders.

  • Improving factor market access to reduce rural vulnerability: Led by the University of Nairobi’s Department of Agricultural Economics, this research focuses in particular on rural land and finance markets, and how increasing land pressure and conflict and the changing shape of liberalizing financial sectors affect smallholders’ security of access to land.

  • Safety nets in marginal areas: Led by Cornell and Clark Atlanta, with collaboration from Syracuse University (all on non-SAGA funding), this subproject focuses on the interrelationship between public safety nets, such as food aid and livestock destocking/restocking programs, and private assistance schemes based on social insurance mechanisms, informal lending, and altruistic transfers, particularly in arid and semi-arid areas especially prone to climate, conflict and market shocks. This work has already generated three working papers.

Under the SAGA-Kenya’s second theme "Empowering the rural poor," the team is pursuing interrelated sub-projects on the following sub-themes, and expects to hold a policy workshop in July-August, 2004:
  • The role of producer organizations in enhancing smallholder market participation: Led by Tegemeo, this sub-project is identifying appropriate institutional frameworks for producer organizations so as to enhance small farmers’ participation and efficiency in input and output markets.

  • Decentralization and participation: Led by IPAR, this sub-project focuses the decentralization of and participation in agricultural extension services in rural Kenya, examining the level, scope, nature, and quality of popular participation in decentralized allocation mechanisms, fiscal accountability under these arrangements, and the factors that determine the capacity and effectiveness of the poor participating in and benefiting from these programs.

  • Community groups and networks: Led by Cornell (on non-SAGA funding), this sub-project studies social networks and community groups with respect to their effects on risk-taking, technology adoption, and livelihood strategy choice in rural communities. One component of this has been funded by the Rockefeller Foundation for a dissertation project by Cornell education Ph.D. candidate David Amudavi, a lecturer at Kenya’s Egerton University. Another component has been funded by Cornell University, the National Science Foundation, and the Social Science Research Council, for dissertation field research by Cornell agricultural economics Ph.D. candidate Heidi Hogset. Both Mr. Amudavi and Ms. Hogset began field work in August, 2003, and will remain in Kenya for approximately one year.
The March 2004 workshop on "Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Method of Poverty Analysis in Kenya," co-organized by IPAR and Cornell and co-sponsored by the World Bank, aims to develop and promote the use of mixed methods of poverty analysis within the Kenyan research community. There is considerable interest in this approach within the policy research community, not just the SAGA institutions (IPAR, KIPPRA, Tegemeo, University of Nairobi), but also within the Ministries (e.g., Agriculture, Livestock Development), the Kenya Agricultural Research Institute, and various universities and NGOs active in the country. At present there is, however, little understanding of or experience with the method. The objective of the workshop is to familiarize the policy research community (both producers and end-users in donor and operational agencies and government) with these techniques. Tentatively, the program will consist of three parts. The first part will offer three talks: one, an overview of the theory and potential of mixed methods, with the second and third presentations by people using quantitative and qualitative methods, discussing the limits of what they can do/learn by their approach. Prof. Germano Mwabu of the University of Nairobi (and a key player in the Africa Economic Research Consortium) has informally agreed to make the quantitative presentation based on his work with Kenya’s Welfare Monitoring Survey data, explicitly discussing where qualitative work could be a useful complement. We are presently approaching an equivalently distinguished scholar doing analogous qualitative (e.g., sustainable livelihoods) work. The second part of the workshop will feature three presentations by researchers attempting to use such mixed methods in Kenya. The idea is to demonstrate the concept through some specific cases. The third part will feature a panel discussion with representatives from government ministries, donor agencies, NGOs, universities, and non-university research institutions, tasked to reflect on how best to employ these methods (if at all), how best to train people to use them, etc. We plan to publish the papers from the first two parts as a small book that can be used for training purposes in country/region.

2. Institutional linkages/collaborators:

Institute of Policy Analysis and Research (IPAR); Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis (KIPPRA); Tegemeo Institute of Agricultural Policy and Development; the University of Nairobi Department of Agricultural Economics (Kabete campus); Clark Atlanta University; Syracuse University.

As Kenya’s lone SISERA member institute, IPAR is "first among equals" and coordinates the SAGA-Kenya program, serving as host or co-host for prospective SAGA small grant awardees, primary contact point for communications between the Cornell and Kenya teams, and the logistical coordinator for SAGA events in Kenya. IPAR, KIPPRA, Tegemeo, and the University of Nairobi each have a separate subcontract from Cornell for research under SAGA-Kenya, as leaders of specific sub-projects, several of which are jointly staffed, encouraging new collaborations. Finally, at the encouragement of Clark Atlanta and Cornell Universities, Tegemeo has begun exploring the possibility of membership in SISERA.

The research program SAGA is pursuing in Kenya was developed collaboratively through repeated consultations, both in Kenya and via email and by telephone, between Cornell, Clark Atlanta, IPAR, KIPPRA, Tegemeo, the University of Nairobi, USAID-Kenya, USAID-REDSO and USAID-Washington. Meetings were held in Nairobi in January and August, 2003, between SAGA-Kenya team leader Chris Barrett and Kenyan partners, and we held a team meeting in Durban, South Africa, where we were all attending the 25th triennial meetings of the International Association of Agricultural Economists.

It took time to get terms of reference and subcontracts finalized between Cornell and each of the participating institutions, which caused a delayed start to the field research. But the last of the subcontracts was put in place and the last of the budgetary advances was made in September, 2003. Each institution has now begun its SAGA research.

Based on previously collected data, several working papers have already been released to which SAGA directly contributed. These include the following:
  • "Decomposing Producer Price Risk: A Policy Analysis Tool With An Application to Northern Kenyan Livestock Markets," October 2002, Christopher B. Barrett and Winnie K. Luseno. This paper introduces a simple method of price risk decomposition that determines the extent to which producer price risk is attributable to volatile inter-market margins, intra-day variation, intra-week (day of week) variation, or terminal market price variability. We apply the method to livestock markets in northern Kenya, a setting of dramatic price volatility where price stabilization is a live policy issue. In this particular application, we find that large, variable inter-market basis is the most important factor in explaining producer price risk in animals typically traded between markets. Local market conditions explain most price risk in other markets, in which traded animals rarely exit the region. Variability in terminal market prices accounts for relatively little price risk faced by pastoralists in the dry lands of northern Kenya although this is the focus of most present policy prescriptions under discussion.

  • "Social Identity and Manipulative Interhousehold Transfers Among East African Pastoralists," October 2002, Marieke Huysentruyt, Christopher B. Barrett, and John G. McPeak. We model interhousehold transfers between nomadic livestock herders as the state-dependent consequence of individuals’ strategic interdependence resulting from the existence of multiple, opposing externalities. A public good security externality among individuals sharing a social (e.g., ethnic) identity in a potentially hostile environment creates incentives to band together. Self-interested interhousehold wealth transfers from wealthier herders to poorer ones may emerge endogenously within a limited wealth space as a means to motivate accompanying migration by the recipient. The distributional reach and size of the transfer are limited, however, by a resource appropriation externality related to the use of common property grazing lands. When this effect dominates, it can induce distributionally regressive transfers from ex ante poor households who want to relieve grazing pressures caused by larger herds. As compared to the extant literature on transfers, our model appears more consistent with the limited available empirical evidence on heterogeneous and changing transfers patterns among east African pastoralists.

  • Bayesian Herders: Updating of Rainfall Beliefs In Response To External Forecasts," Revised March 2006, Travis J. Lybbert, Christopher B. Barrett, John G. McPeak, and Winnie K. Luseno. TTemporal climate risk weighs heavily on many of the world’s poor. Model-based climate forecasts could benefit such populations, provided recipients use forecast information to update climate expectations. We test whether pastoralists in southern Ethiopia and northern Kenya update their expectations in response to forecast information. The minority of herders who received these climate forecasts updated their expectations for below normal rainfall, but not for above normal rainfall. This revealed preoccupation with downside risk highlights the potential value of better climate forecasts in averting drought-related losses, but realizing any welfare gains requires that recipients strategically react to these updated expectations.


  • "Smallholder Identities and Social Networks: The Challenge of Improving Productivity and Welfare," July 2003, Christopher B. Barrett. This paper proposes a general framework for resolving the puzzle of how to reconcile the mass of recent evidence on the salutary effects of social capital at the individual level with the casual, larger-scale observation that social embeddedness appears negatively correlated with productivity and material measures of welfare. It advances an analytical framework that not only explains individual productivity or technology adoption behavior as a function of the characteristics or behaviors of others, but that also explains the aggregate properties of social systems characterized by persistently low productivity. Examples from Kenya and Madagascar are used to illustrate the phenomena discussed.

  • "Rural Poverty Dynamics: Development Policy Implications," September 2003, Christopher B. Barrett. This paper, prepared as a plenary address to the 25th triennial meetings of the International Association of Agricultural Economists, held in Durban, South Africa, summarizes a few key findings from a rich and growing body of research on the nature of rural poverty and, especially, the development policy implications of relatively recent findings and ongoing work. Perhaps the most fundamental lesson of recent research on rural poverty is the need to distinguish transitory from chronic poverty. The existence of widespread chronic poverty also raises the possibility of poverty traps. Barrett discusses some of the empirical and theoretical challenges of identifying and explaining poverty traps. In policy terms, the distinction between transitory and chronic poverty implies a need to distinguish between "cargo net" and "safety net" interventions and a central role for effective targeting of interventions. The paper uses data from Kenya and Madagascar to illustrate the core points.

  • "Fractal Poverty Traps," Published January 2006, Christopher B. Barrett and Brent M. Swallow. This paper offers an informal theory of a special sort of poverty trap, one in which multiple dynamic equilibria exist simultaneously at multiple (micro, meso and/or macro) scales of analysis and are self-reinforcing through feedback effects. Small adjustments at any one of these levels are unlikely to move the system away from its dominant, stable dynamic equilibrium. Governments, markets and communities are simultaneously weak in places characterized by fractal poverty traps. No unit operates at a high-level equilibrium in such a system. All seem simultaneously trapped in low-level equilibria. The fractal poverty traps formulation suggests four interrelated strategic emphases for poverty reduction strategies.

  • "Poverty Traps and Safety Nets," September 2003, Christopher B. Barrett and John G. McPeak. This paper uses data from northern Kenya to argue that the concept of poverty traps needs to be taken seriously, and that if poverty traps indeed exist, then safety nets become all the more important. However, as presently practiced, safety nets based on food aid appear to be failing in northern Kenya.
3. Planned Activities:

In-country research partners will continue their specific field research and data analysis activities. We will hold the workshop on Mixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods in March, 2004. Chris Barrett will travel again to Kenya in March, 2004, to consult with the Kenya-based team and to participate in that workshop. Students undertaking field dissertation research in collaboration with the SAGA program (David Amudavi, Heidi Hogset and Andrew Mude) will continue their field research. The project will continue to release original working papers.

Previous Section | Next Section

Return to SAGA Progress Report (October 2003) Table of Contents


HOME | RESEARCH | PUBLICATIONS | TECHNICAL ASSISTANCE | CONFERENCES | GRANTS | PARTNERS | PROJECT PERSONNEL | PROGRESS REPORTS | LINKS | CONTACT US | SEARCH



© 2017, 2016–2004 SAGA